The Conversation is a popular newspaper in Spain, published from and headquartered in Spain. In this article, Mediabuzz is going to analyze The Conversation’s media bias and The Conversation’s factual reporting on the basis of its coverage, language used, presidential endorsements, media reports, research and blind surveys. We have also commented on the left or right biasedness of the The Conversation along with its factual accuracy.
Media Bias Analysis Summary
After thorough research, we will conclude whether the The Conversationis Left Leaning, Right Leaning or Centred in its approach. For The Conversation, we will go through several researches, studies, blind surveys, headline analysis, etc. to comment on The Conversation’s media bias. Based on the above analysis, we will assign one of the media bias meter out of all the seven possible meters shown here.
Factual Reporting Summary
For commenting on the factual accuracy of the The Conversation, we will flip through previous news articles of the publication and observe if The Conversation has published any factually incorrect information. Based on this, we will conclude that we have commented on the factual accuracy of The Conversation. Based on the above analysis, we will assign one of the media reliability meter out of all the three possible meters shown here.
A. The Conversation Media Bias Analysis
Under this section, we will briefly explain the factors that contribute towards our media bias conclusion for The Conversation. We will observe, analyse and comment on the The Conversation language used, presidential endorsement, controversies, allegations, political views of The Conversation’s editors, etc. to support our inference.
1. The Conversation Emotional Influence & Adjectives in Headlines
We will rummage through previous headlines of The Conversation to look out for usage of influential language, adjectives, emotionally charged words, etc. that suggests any bias of The Conversation towards any side of the spectrum.
2. The Conversation Endorsement of President
Endorsement of presidential candidates in elections comments strongly about a newspaper’s affiliation towards left or right. We will look out for candidates that The Conversation has endorsed in previous presidential elections to support The Conversation’s political bias.
3. Political leader’s Criticism of The Conversation
A political leader’s frequent criticism of The Conversation will also suggest about political inclination of the newspaper. In this section, we will observe if any political leader has criticised The Conversation in the past to support our arguments.
4. Allegations on The Conversation
Under this section, we will look out for any previous allegations against The Conversation by any political leader, party, organization or readers to support if The Conversation is biased towards left, right or center.
5. Media Bias Articles from Research Papers, Institutions, etc.
Several reputed fact checking and media bias analytics organizations conduct thorough surveys and research to write about The Conversation media bias. To substantiate our claims about The Conversation’s media bias inclination, we will cite these highly reliable sources and research from reputed organizations.
6. Audience of The Conversation
The audience of The Conversation also strongly suggests its media bias. Therefore, to further substantiate our claims, we will write about The Conversation’s audience whether they are democrats or republicans in their political affinities.
7. The Conversation’s controversial statements and tweets
Several newspapers make controversial statements or tweets on social media that reflect their affinity towards any ideology. We will flip through The Conversation social media accounts to look for clues that suggests The Conversation media bias.
8. Popular editors of The Conversation
Any popular person or editor associated with the The Conversation will also speak a lot about The Conversation’s media bias. We will analyze popular persons or editors of The Conversation that are directly or indirectly linked to any political party or ideology.
9. The Conversation CEO’s political views
In this section, we will look if The Conversation CEO supports or sponsors any political party directly or indirectly. We will look for his tweets, statements, opinion pieces, and controversies that will take us towards The Conversation’s media bias.
B. The Conversation Factual Reporting Analysis
After The Conversation media bias, we will write about The Conversation’s factual reporting, to check whether The Conversation is reliable or not. There are several parameters on which we will be analyzing The Conversation’s factual accuracies and will comment if The Conversation has ever published any false or misleading reports.
1. The Conversation’s misleading or false news articles
We will look for The Conversation’s previous history if it has ever intentionally or unintentionally published any fake news, false or misleading reports to influence audience. We will also write about false claims made by The Conversation in its Op-Ed or news section.
2. Popular Fact-Checking Organizations’ Analysis of The Conversation
Several fact-checking organizations including Politico, FactCheck, Snopes, Poynter, etc. conduct frequent fact-check on news articles published by newspapers. We will list down fact-checks that mentioned The Conversation to suggest if The Conversation has published false stories in the past or not.
3. Sources of The Conversation
Sources quotes by newspapers are also indicative of their reliability. We will check the sources quoted by The Conversation in their news stories to find out if The Conversation is factually reliable or not.
C. The Conversation Reliability Ratings by Fact-Checking Organizations
Several organizations across the globe independently conduct thorough research and studies on the pattern of news coverage by mainstream media. These websites study the articles published by the news media with the help of professionals and rate them on the basis of bias and reliability. Under this section, we will find out what other fact-checking organizations and media monitors have to say about The Conversation.
D. History of The Conversation
The Conversation is based out of Spain and primarily published from Spain . In this section, we will comment about the history of The Conversation including The Conversation founder, The Conversation publisher, The Conversation circulation and The Conversation headquarters.
E. The Conversation Funding & Ownership
Under this section, mediabuzz will write about The Conversation’s investors, stakeholders and owners to analyze how The Conversation’s media bias and factual reliability is affected.
F. Readers of The Conversation
Under this section, we will provide you approximate numbers of readers The Conversation enjoy. It will also have an age-wise, demographic-wise, gender-wise and political opinion-wise distribution of The Conversation audience.
G. The Conversation Media Bias and Credibility – Conclusion
After a thorough analysis of The Conversation on the above mentioned parameters, we will sum up if The Conversation is a left, center or right biased newspaper. Based on the analysis, we will offer a judgement on whether The Conversation is a reliable or unreliable publication when factual reporting is concerned.