Seattle Post-Intelligencer is a popular newspaper in United States (US), published from and headquartered in United States (US). In this article, Mediabuzz is going to analyze Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s media bias and Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s factual reporting on the basis of its coverage, language used, presidential endorsements, media reports, research and blind surveys. We have also commented on the left or right biasedness of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer along with its factual accuracy.
Media Bias Analysis Summary
After thorough research, we will conclude whether the Seattle Post-Intelligenceris Left Leaning, Right Leaning or Centred in its approach. For Seattle Post-Intelligencer, we will go through several researches, studies, blind surveys, headline analysis, etc. to comment on Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s media bias. Based on the above analysis, we will assign one of the media bias meter out of all the seven possible meters shown here.
Factual Reporting Summary
For commenting on the factual accuracy of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, we will flip through previous news articles of the publication and observe if Seattle Post-Intelligencer has published any factually incorrect information. Based on this, we will conclude that we have commented on the factual accuracy of Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Based on the above analysis, we will assign one of the media reliability meter out of all the three possible meters shown here.
A. Seattle Post-Intelligencer Media Bias Analysis
Under this section, we will briefly explain the factors that contribute towards our media bias conclusion for Seattle Post-Intelligencer. We will observe, analyse and comment on the Seattle Post-Intelligencer language used, presidential endorsement, controversies, allegations, political views of Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s editors, etc. to support our inference.
1. Seattle Post-Intelligencer Emotional Influence & Adjectives in Headlines
We will rummage through previous headlines of Seattle Post-Intelligencer to look out for usage of influential language, adjectives, emotionally charged words, etc. that suggests any bias of Seattle Post-Intelligencer towards any side of the spectrum.
2. Seattle Post-Intelligencer Endorsement of President
Endorsement of presidential candidates in elections comments strongly about a newspaper’s affiliation towards left or right. We will look out for candidates that Seattle Post-Intelligencer has endorsed in previous presidential elections to support Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s political bias.
3. Political leader’s Criticism of Seattle Post-Intelligencer
A political leader’s frequent criticism of Seattle Post-Intelligencer will also suggest about political inclination of the newspaper. In this section, we will observe if any political leader has criticised Seattle Post-Intelligencer in the past to support our arguments.
4. Allegations on Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Under this section, we will look out for any previous allegations against Seattle Post-Intelligencer by any political leader, party, organization or readers to support if Seattle Post-Intelligencer is biased towards left, right or center.
5. Media Bias Articles from Research Papers, Institutions, etc.
Several reputed fact checking and media bias analytics organizations conduct thorough surveys and research to write about Seattle Post-Intelligencer media bias. To substantiate our claims about Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s media bias inclination, we will cite these highly reliable sources and research from reputed organizations.
6. Audience of Seattle Post-Intelligencer
The audience of Seattle Post-Intelligencer also strongly suggests its media bias. Therefore, to further substantiate our claims, we will write about Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s audience whether they are democrats or republicans in their political affinities.
7. Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s controversial statements and tweets
Several newspapers make controversial statements or tweets on social media that reflect their affinity towards any ideology. We will flip through Seattle Post-Intelligencer social media accounts to look for clues that suggests Seattle Post-Intelligencer media bias.
8. Popular editors of Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Any popular person or editor associated with the Seattle Post-Intelligencer will also speak a lot about Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s media bias. We will analyze popular persons or editors of Seattle Post-Intelligencer that are directly or indirectly linked to any political party or ideology.
9. Seattle Post-Intelligencer CEO’s political views
In this section, we will look if Seattle Post-Intelligencer CEO supports or sponsors any political party directly or indirectly. We will look for his tweets, statements, opinion pieces, and controversies that will take us towards Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s media bias.
B. Seattle Post-Intelligencer Factual Reporting Analysis
After Seattle Post-Intelligencer media bias, we will write about Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s factual reporting, to check whether Seattle Post-Intelligencer is reliable or not. There are several parameters on which we will be analyzing Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s factual accuracies and will comment if Seattle Post-Intelligencer has ever published any false or misleading reports.
1. Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s misleading or false news articles
We will look for Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s previous history if it has ever intentionally or unintentionally published any fake news, false or misleading reports to influence audience. We will also write about false claims made by Seattle Post-Intelligencer in its Op-Ed or news section.
2. Popular Fact-Checking Organizations’ Analysis of Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Several fact-checking organizations including Politico, FactCheck, Snopes, Poynter, etc. conduct frequent fact-check on news articles published by newspapers. We will list down fact-checks that mentioned Seattle Post-Intelligencer to suggest if Seattle Post-Intelligencer has published false stories in the past or not.
3. Sources of Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Sources quotes by newspapers are also indicative of their reliability. We will check the sources quoted by Seattle Post-Intelligencer in their news stories to find out if Seattle Post-Intelligencer is factually reliable or not.
C. Seattle Post-Intelligencer Reliability Ratings by Fact-Checking Organizations
Several organizations across the globe independently conduct thorough research and studies on the pattern of news coverage by mainstream media. These websites study the articles published by the news media with the help of professionals and rate them on the basis of bias and reliability. Under this section, we will find out what other fact-checking organizations and media monitors have to say about Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
D. History of Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Seattle Post-Intelligencer is based out of United States (US) and primarily published from United States (US) . In this section, we will comment about the history of Seattle Post-Intelligencer including Seattle Post-Intelligencer founder, Seattle Post-Intelligencer publisher, Seattle Post-Intelligencer circulation and Seattle Post-Intelligencer headquarters.
E. Seattle Post-Intelligencer Funding & Ownership
Under this section, mediabuzz will write about Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s investors, stakeholders and owners to analyze how Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s media bias and factual reliability is affected.
F. Readers of Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Under this section, we will provide you approximate numbers of readers Seattle Post-Intelligencer enjoy. It will also have an age-wise, demographic-wise, gender-wise and political opinion-wise distribution of Seattle Post-Intelligencer audience.
G. Seattle Post-Intelligencer Media Bias and Credibility – Conclusion
After a thorough analysis of Seattle Post-Intelligencer on the above mentioned parameters, we will sum up if Seattle Post-Intelligencer is a left, center or right biased newspaper. Based on the analysis, we will offer a judgement on whether Seattle Post-Intelligencer is a reliable or unreliable publication when factual reporting is concerned.