Armenian Weekly (Watertown) is a popular newspaper in United States (US), published from and headquartered in United States (US). In this article, Mediabuzz is going to analyze Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s media bias and Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s factual reporting on the basis of its coverage, language used, presidential endorsements, media reports, research and blind surveys. We have also commented on the left or right biasedness of the Armenian Weekly (Watertown) along with its factual accuracy.
Media Bias Analysis Summary
After thorough research, we will conclude whether the Armenian Weekly (Watertown)is Left Leaning, Right Leaning or Centred in its approach. For Armenian Weekly (Watertown), we will go through several researches, studies, blind surveys, headline analysis, etc. to comment on Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s media bias. Based on the above analysis, we will assign one of the media bias meter out of all the seven possible meters shown here.
Factual Reporting Summary
For commenting on the factual accuracy of the Armenian Weekly (Watertown), we will flip through previous news articles of the publication and observe if Armenian Weekly (Watertown) has published any factually incorrect information. Based on this, we will conclude that we have commented on the factual accuracy of Armenian Weekly (Watertown). Based on the above analysis, we will assign one of the media reliability meter out of all the three possible meters shown here.
A. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) Media Bias Analysis
Under this section, we will briefly explain the factors that contribute towards our media bias conclusion for Armenian Weekly (Watertown). We will observe, analyse and comment on the Armenian Weekly (Watertown) language used, presidential endorsement, controversies, allegations, political views of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s editors, etc. to support our inference.
1. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) Emotional Influence & Adjectives in Headlines
We will rummage through previous headlines of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) to look out for usage of influential language, adjectives, emotionally charged words, etc. that suggests any bias of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) towards any side of the spectrum.
2. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) Endorsement of President
Endorsement of presidential candidates in elections comments strongly about a newspaper’s affiliation towards left or right. We will look out for candidates that Armenian Weekly (Watertown) has endorsed in previous presidential elections to support Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s political bias.
3. Political leader’s Criticism of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
A political leader’s frequent criticism of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) will also suggest about political inclination of the newspaper. In this section, we will observe if any political leader has criticised Armenian Weekly (Watertown) in the past to support our arguments.
4. Allegations on Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
Under this section, we will look out for any previous allegations against Armenian Weekly (Watertown) by any political leader, party, organization or readers to support if Armenian Weekly (Watertown) is biased towards left, right or center.
5. Media Bias Articles from Research Papers, Institutions, etc.
Several reputed fact checking and media bias analytics organizations conduct thorough surveys and research to write about Armenian Weekly (Watertown) media bias. To substantiate our claims about Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s media bias inclination, we will cite these highly reliable sources and research from reputed organizations.
6. Audience of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
The audience of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) also strongly suggests its media bias. Therefore, to further substantiate our claims, we will write about Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s audience whether they are democrats or republicans in their political affinities.
7. Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s controversial statements and tweets
Several newspapers make controversial statements or tweets on social media that reflect their affinity towards any ideology. We will flip through Armenian Weekly (Watertown) social media accounts to look for clues that suggests Armenian Weekly (Watertown) media bias.
8. Popular editors of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
Any popular person or editor associated with the Armenian Weekly (Watertown) will also speak a lot about Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s media bias. We will analyze popular persons or editors of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) that are directly or indirectly linked to any political party or ideology.
9. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) CEO’s political views
In this section, we will look if Armenian Weekly (Watertown) CEO supports or sponsors any political party directly or indirectly. We will look for his tweets, statements, opinion pieces, and controversies that will take us towards Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s media bias.
B. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) Factual Reporting Analysis
After Armenian Weekly (Watertown) media bias, we will write about Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s factual reporting, to check whether Armenian Weekly (Watertown) is reliable or not. There are several parameters on which we will be analyzing Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s factual accuracies and will comment if Armenian Weekly (Watertown) has ever published any false or misleading reports.
1. Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s misleading or false news articles
We will look for Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s previous history if it has ever intentionally or unintentionally published any fake news, false or misleading reports to influence audience. We will also write about false claims made by Armenian Weekly (Watertown) in its Op-Ed or news section.
2. Popular Fact-Checking Organizations’ Analysis of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
Several fact-checking organizations including Politico, FactCheck, Snopes, Poynter, etc. conduct frequent fact-check on news articles published by newspapers. We will list down fact-checks that mentioned Armenian Weekly (Watertown) to suggest if Armenian Weekly (Watertown) has published false stories in the past or not.
3. Sources of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
Sources quotes by newspapers are also indicative of their reliability. We will check the sources quoted by Armenian Weekly (Watertown) in their news stories to find out if Armenian Weekly (Watertown) is factually reliable or not.
C. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) Reliability Ratings by Fact-Checking Organizations
Several organizations across the globe independently conduct thorough research and studies on the pattern of news coverage by mainstream media. These websites study the articles published by the news media with the help of professionals and rate them on the basis of bias and reliability. Under this section, we will find out what other fact-checking organizations and media monitors have to say about Armenian Weekly (Watertown).
D. History of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
Armenian Weekly (Watertown) is based out of United States (US) and primarily published from United States (US) . In this section, we will comment about the history of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) including Armenian Weekly (Watertown) founder, Armenian Weekly (Watertown) publisher, Armenian Weekly (Watertown) circulation and Armenian Weekly (Watertown) headquarters.
E. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) Funding & Ownership
Under this section, mediabuzz will write about Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s investors, stakeholders and owners to analyze how Armenian Weekly (Watertown)’s media bias and factual reliability is affected.
F. Readers of Armenian Weekly (Watertown)
Under this section, we will provide you approximate numbers of readers Armenian Weekly (Watertown) enjoy. It will also have an age-wise, demographic-wise, gender-wise and political opinion-wise distribution of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) audience.
G. Armenian Weekly (Watertown) Media Bias and Credibility – Conclusion
After a thorough analysis of Armenian Weekly (Watertown) on the above mentioned parameters, we will sum up if Armenian Weekly (Watertown) is a left, center or right biased newspaper. Based on the analysis, we will offer a judgement on whether Armenian Weekly (Watertown) is a reliable or unreliable publication when factual reporting is concerned.